Beekeepers and Public Interest Groups Sue EPA Over Bee-Toxic Pesticides
Our bees need protecting. Daniel Lane photo
Last Thursday, four beekeepers and five environmental and consumer groups filed a public interest lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on its failure to protect pollinators from dangerous pesticides. The coalition, represented by attorneys for the Center for Food Safety (CFS), seeks suspension of the registrations of insecticides that have repeatedly been identified as highly toxic to honey bees, clear causes of major bee kills and significant contributors to the devastating ongoing mortality of bees known as colony collapse disorder (CCD). The suit not only challenges EPA’s handling of the pesticides, but also raises concerns over the agency’s practice of “conditional registration” and pesticide labeling deficiencies.
“America’s beekeepers cannot survive for long with the toxic environment EPA has supported. Bee-toxic pesticides in dozens of widely used products, on top of many other stresses our industry faces, are killing our bees and threatening our livelihoods,” said plaintiff Steve Ellis, a Minnesota and California beekeeper. “Our country depends on bees for crop pollination and honey production. It’s time for EPA to recognize the value of bees to our food system and agricultural economy.”
Marta Lane suits up to videotape a local beekeeper for Kauai Grown. Daniel Lane photo
The suit comes on the heels of a challenging season for California’s almond farmers, who produce 80-percent of the world’s almonds. Almond growers rely on beekeepers to bring literally billions of bees from across the country to pollinate their orchards. However, many beekeepers are reporting losses of over 50-percent this year and the shortages have left many California almond growers without enough bees to effectively pollinate their trees. This is a vivid demonstration of why the Plaintiffs are urging EPA to characterize these bee-toxic pesticides as an “imminent hazard” and move swiftly to restrict their use.
The pesticides involved clothianidin and thiamethoxam are “neonicotinoids,” a newer class of systemic insecticides that are absorbed by plants and transported throughout the plant’s vascular tissue, making the plant potentially toxic to insects. Clothianidin and thiamethoxam first came into heavy use in the mid-2000s, at the same time beekeepers started observing widespread cases of colony loses, leaving beekeepers unable to recoup their losses.
“Beekeepers and environmental and consumer groups have demonstrated time and time again over the last several years that EPA needs to protect bees. The agency has refused, so we’ve been compelled to sue,” said CFS attorney, Peter T. Jenkins. “The records we have seen show several legal violations by EPA that should convince the Court to suspend all or most of the approvals for clothianidin and thiamethoxam products until those violations are resolved.”
The case also challenges the use of so-called “conditional registrations,” which expedite the approval process, but also bypass sufficient review. Since 2000, over two-thirds of pesticide products, including clothianidin and thiamethoxam, have been brought to market as conditional registrations.
America’s beekeepers cannot survive for long with the toxic environment EPA has supported. Daniel Lane photo
“Pesticide manufacturers use conditional registrations to rush bee-toxic products to market, with little public oversight,” said Paul Towers, a spokesperson for Pesticide Action Network. “As new independent research comes to light, the agency has been slow to re-evaluate pesticide products and its process, leaving bees exposed to an ever-growing load of hazardous pesticides.”
In addition, the plaintiffs challenge the inadequacies of existing pesticide labels meant to ensure environmental and health protections. “EPA has ignored its responsibility to protect bees by allowing impractical labels and lax enforcement,” said Jay Feldman, Executive Director of Beyond Pesticides. “Despite clear evidence and on-the-ground feedback to the contrary, EPA has failed to ensure that bees, birds and ecosystems are protected.”
Fresh honeycomb from Ein Rogel Farm. Daniel Lane photo
Independent scientists have assessed the effects of clothianidin and thiamethoxam on honey bee colony health and development, examining both sub-lethal exposure effects and acute risks. Scientists have also identified massive data gaps that prevent accurate assessments as to their continued safety, not just for honey bees but for ecosystem integrity on the whole. A major new report issued this week by the American Bird Conservancy, The Impact of the Nation’s Most Widely Used Insecticides on Birds, dire warnings about EPA’s failures to assess threats to birds and to the aquatic ecosystems many species depend upon.
In March 2012, CFS and a coalition of prominent beekeepers filed an Emergency Petitionwith the EPA asking the agency to suspend the use of clothianidin. Yet, to date, the agency has refused and indicated it will not finish its Registration Review for clothianidin and thiamethoxam, as well as other neonicotinoids, until 2018.
The suit was filed earlier today in the Northern District Court of California. Plaintiffs include four beekeepers, Steve Ellis of Old Mill Honey Co. (MN, CA), Jim Doan of Doan Family Farms (NY), Tom Theobald of Niwot Honey Farm (CO) and Bill Rhodes of Bill Rhodes Honey (FL) as well as Beyond Pesticides, Center for Food Safety, Pesticide Action Network North America, SIERRA CLUB and the Center for Environmental Health.
Meanwhile, here in Hawaii, pesticides and experimental GMO crops are hotly contested. This compelling 30 minute video shares the concerns residents have, and offer organic farming solutions on Kauai.
Moms on a Mission to Malama Molokai